Target Market |
The target audience will be all citizens concerned with personal rights.
They are various ages and from various income levels. This site should be
visually appealing to attract the general public. Target market examples
include: ACLU members, potential members, students entering essay contest,
general public looking for information about the ACLU. |
Testing Respondents |
Respondents include: Center for Well Being: Kristi Anderson,
Heather Dubin; Puente Project: Bonnie Chun, Patricia Seaton,
Kent Ward; SRJC Bookstore: Wendy Hecker, Carol Ho, Anne
Petteford, Ivan Todd; Other: Irene Harper, Adaptive PE. The following are people we did not hear from for the report: Center for Well Being: Tracy Beeman and Jeni Pucillo (late); Puente Project: Melissa Gonzales; SRJC Bookstore: Sebastian Amiet. We had 13 assigned testers and received 10 responses and 1 submital from an unassigned group. Testing dates from Monday, November 18th through Tuesday, November 26th. After this date I received an e-mail from 3 students who said they had sent their response but I had no record of receiving the information. Late submittals received on Monday, December 2nd from Jeni Pucillo. Comments reviewed but too late to include in results. |
Conditions of Testing |
Computer | Operating System | Monitor/Bitdepth/Resolution | Browser | Internet |
PC 535 Mz | Windows 98 | 17", 24 bit | IE 6 | 56k |
HP | Windows XP | 17", 32 Bit, 800X600 | IE 6 Net 4.7 | 56k |
Mac ibook | OS 9.1 | 12" | IE 5 | 56k |
Compaq Laptop | Windows 98 | 13", 16 bit | Net 6 | 56k |
Dell Dimension 8100 | Windows ME | 17", 800x600 | IE 5.017 | 56k |
Gateway GP7-500 | Windows 98 | 17", 16 bit, 1024x768 | IE 5 | 1.5Mb Cable |
PC Pentium II | Windows 98 | 17" 16 bit | IE 6 | 56k |
Dell 8200 | Windows 2000 | 19", 32 bit, 1024x768 | IE 6.0 | 56k |
Questions |
What is the site about? |
The site is about the ACLU and it's involvement with protection of civil rights and civil liberties.
The site informs viewers about civil rights, what's up with the latest civil issues, and how interested people can get involved. The ACLU organization fights for the civil rights of American citizens. American Civil Liberties Union Northern California affiliate. |
What was your first impression
of the home page? |
Wow! Really - that was my reaction. It grabs you. Very professional-looking. Dramatic color scheme - I think it really fits the client.
Bold. Big. Clean. American. Love the colors. The homepage is upfront and dramatic. Very professional, attractive home page. I really liked the graphic with the statue of liberty and the American flag. Crisp, organized, institutional. I think the homepage is very clean, makes a bold statement, kind of along the lines of the ACLU in itself. |
Were did you first click? |
Annual Dinner and Civil Liberties Issues. Essay contest link. About this chapter page. Get involved page. I wanted to see how to participate after reading what ACLU was about. Civil liberties issues button. Civil Liberty Issues link on the left, then once in that page, clicked on "The Death Penalty". |
Did you find the site easy
to navigate? |
Very
Yes The only thing that didn't stand out were the links within the text because it was hard to distinguish the colors of the links and the fact that they aren't underlined. |
What is the overall tone
and feel of the site?
|
Very professional with a clean appealing design especially on the home page.
Action-oriented, simple yet chock-full of good information that is well-formatted. It came across to me very clean and professional looking and peaked my interest! Very precise and informational yet layed out in a way that did not overwhelm me with information. I very much like the way the space was used and the short paragraphs of information and statistics made it easy information to read through. Yes, Most were chock-full of quality content. Wants people to join; to inform others of their rights. The feeling I get is "We have something important to say." And, that's true. Crisp, organized, aggressive dominant colors. Comfortable. |
Were the pages interesting?
Why or why not? |
I like the clean, uncluttered look yet with splashed of strong colors and
interesting image layouts. The logo is very strong and clean as well and
I like it very much. Very. I found the text and pages well organized. I liked being able to either delve into a topic (that was linked to more description) or not as I felt. I stayed on this site for awhile. A lot of work had to have gone into this. There's a lot here. I was pleasantly surprised to find a copy of the Constitution and Bill of Rights on the site. Yes, I didn't know such a program existed to help with such cause. Very clean cut, organized razor sharp. I think the pages were interesting just with the information provided within them. would find this site interesting. Yes -- lots of great links (ie, american civil liberties union) and information that people can get to without having known where to go before. This is like a one-stop shopping for people who are into this sort of thing. About the Chapter was boring because it was just a list of names. |
Did you find what you expected
from the pages?
|
Yes More actually. I thought such a site would be boring. The page about Civil Liberties Issues is great in that it just gives teasers about what the issues are and link to more information but didn't overwhelm me. The pages were more political than I expected. They seemed to make sense. Liberties Issues is great in that it just gives teasers about what the issues are and link to more information but didn't overwhelm me. Yes. I expected to see a little more on the 'About the Chapter' page - a little more personal description. |
Could you find information
on the Essay Contest and Contest Resources?
|
Yes I just clicked the essay contest link.
Yes, click the essay contest page. Inside, the contest resources page is right above the navigation bar. Essay Contest-very evident from the home page. I was expecting contest resources further down the page, after a description of the contest. |
What did you think of the
second-level pages?
|
Shows consistency with design and are well organized.
Good information and easy to read. Nice layout. The graphic is pared down nicely to show this is a second-level. I think the second level pages look good, very clean like the home page. Nice use of scale and juxtaposition of images but it falls a little on the second level; I wanted more image variation I would have liked to see the main graphic rollover to more images on the second level pages to break up the enormous amount of content. Visually striking, very clear, un-utilized white space at the top right of the page I kept expecting to be used for something. |
Were the third level links
easy to find and use? |
Yes The 3rd level links were easy to find and navigate. They were in an unexpected place; they worked well. |
What did you think of the
newsletters in PDF format?
|
I like the PDF newsletters -- they look awesome, the text and pictures
come across so clear. You guys did a great job on these.
|
Did you see any images missing?
If yes, which page(s)?
|
No, majority response.
Yes, on the Winter 2002 Newsletter on page 3, the Rohnert Park City Logos are missing. In the home page, the picture of Statue of Liberty has a line across it, making photo look like it was pieced together. |
Regarding download time
of each page? Did any pages take an aggravating long time to load? If
so, which ones? |
Pages loaded quickly. No, they loaded within 2-5 seconds. Just the newsletters. |
Did you find any links not
working? If so which link and on what page? What was the error message
received?
|
No, majority response. The home button on the Annual Dinner page gave me the 404 error that the page could not be found. |
What did you like best about
the site?
|
I liked the crispness of the graphics and the clarity of the information and
its organization. The pages were kept clean, simple and very informative. The ease of readability and navigation. I also like the professional feel though. I like the organization of the Constitution page a lot. I like the home page the most; Dramatic On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give this site a 20. I am that impressed. I liked the home page graphic the best. I like the colors and the design the best. |
Please give 3 words to describe
the site. |
Attractive … functional … impressive Clean, professional, informative. American. Bold. Professional. Warm, Informative & Inviting; good blend of colors. Professional, informative, good blends of colors. Dramatic, serious, "has a mission". |
What suggestions for improvements
do you have?
|
Nice job guys! |
Summary |
We are pleased with the results received from the classmate questionnaire.
The design layout, color scheme, graphics, organization and clarity effectively
contributed to the professional, informative and easy to navigate site.
We have already corrected the following problems and/or suggestions that
respondents indicated: Pdf's were noted as such, link colors were adjusted
and third level links were changed to classes for easy identification. Also,
the active link rollover color has been changed to blue. We agree there
is a large amount of content and implemented our recommendations to the
client for better clarity of content without compromising his design perspective.
We will discuss adding sub heads for the Constitution page due to its length..
Forms were originally created for the Annual Dinner and Get Involved page
along with the use of PayPal. However, the client chose not to utilize these
format processes. Therefore, Pdf documents were provided. Overall, we are
pleased with the final results of our site for the ACLU. |